11% in my banjo is brim full of rashers so all dangling like dree locks in da lello breeze. Sounds cray Cary coco pops but head Al's resonates also with my grandfather Ala, not to be confused any further that old man I love. I never really dig on the religious melarky truth be told as of all dad men. Truly imbalanced agreed on that fo sure. Maybe a becon on the path not to be followed to one's own grave, unless you have ghost that is. Then you have at least curious and curiouser ding dongs than most No bell lorr ates em for breakfast. I knew that funky croon was barking at the moon y I asked for an audience.,fear is her doom. Fir this is what we all want but yet we consume the very thing at the heart of THE LOOM. I KNOWA THE 1 pertaining personal perr perspective pertaince is in me bones. Crew is most important GOD only knows. I'm not browne nosing or licking frogs spawn but theres a kinda madness to the method if the DICKS WERE WITHDRAWAL... Laters I will cumin again when u know when toodle oo
Hi Paul I love when you and John are on Joe's show it's mind-blowing .. there's so much that's resonates with me. I am super curious about the zoids - do you have a sub stack on that or any videos that I can check out?
Bird languages next on my list to check out so thanks for posting that.
I noticed the The looks when Joe brought up the Bible, That's going to be a big pill for people to swallow, but it's a book & somebody wrote it my logic is how could everything else be tainted and that be the one thing that stood the test of time without being manipulated. 🤷♀️ So if you have any info where you've done any deep diving on that I would love links for it thanks again you guys are amazing thanks for all your hard work ❤️😎
Kim con took the bait like all of little faith. God help her poor girl lost so much weight. Alas it is time but we both know that's not true. In the arms of the Creator where all are loved, even u
hi voice. if i may be so bold, i think i might be able to field that "bible" question for you. 1st: change the word somebody to somebodies. and it's qqqqqqqqqqqquite tainted. just like everything else. each book in both tasty-mints had an author. then over time it has been compiled and edited, then reedited to suit the needs or wants of the person funding the new edition. the trick to passing all this off is just like any other magic show. ignorance,.....both imposed, and willful. more so willful today, than as was at one time imposed. but the effect is still the same. the sheep still get fleeced and slaughtered by those that they blindly follow.
2nd: maybe catch up on a couple of authors....mauro biglino, or paul wallis to start. as with any author....take with a grain of salt and add to your base of knowledge. then go at it from there. pretty soon you be just as able to pull the wool over your own eyes as any of us. you won't need an intermediary to commune with that which has been inside you the whole time.
Hi Russ thank you so much for the comment my apologies for my delayed response I don't get on here much I'm still a newbie. 😎 I completely agree and echoing JFAnon very well said. And I've never been one for looking to someone else for my connection to God source that most definitely is within all of us .. so blessed are we to be alive and part of this Awakening. ❤️🙏🐸
Firstly, just let me applaud. Once that echo fades, I would like to add all the water and swimming analogies inserted into our modern life narrative. I wholeheartedly or wholeheadedly agree that treading and diving and floating and all the Busby Berkeley narratives begin with dipping a toe in the water and seeing what the temperature is. I can't say I begin to grasp it all. Some of it would be impolite to grasp after all. But I have certainly been paddleboarding around it 90% of my life thus far when I fell over parallel universe theory at age 11 and wondered what all the fuss was about. All these decades later, I still get the brain tickle to kick over a pop culture rock and see what's lurking under it. It really has been fascinating. We are here to run the Gauntlet. Perhaps that's the only reason we chose this gig. And I am cool with that.
I find some of your references correlate with my references. Yes 90125 kicked me in the girl-balls when I was in high school. My other brain tickles were also The Beatles and Electric Light Orchestra. Honestly, I am going to have to read and reread this several times and take notes and then report back. There's just so much out at the margins and I seem to have been chasing it from different angles as you both my whole existence just thinking there was something there but not knowing what. Thanks for giving it a name to refer to. Things have never been what they seem. And there I will end it before I blather on endlessly.
Yeah, it is far too vast of a subject to cover completely. This is really just a springboard to get people started. Everyone's interpretations are going to vary a bit.
I’ve read your musings with interest for some time now. Usually finding myself more confused when done. At least this article starts to bring some reason as to why. I’m gonna have to come back to finish and probably finish a dozen times to understand… my brain hurts. It’s not used to this much exercise. Thanks.
Even though I've followed you guys closely, read every X post, read all your articles twice, watched every video, done a bird language thread with 85 posts, I'm still stunned grasping the full magnitude. Thank you for this article. It should be considered a study guide. Read it twice. Put it in Text2Speach and listen to it at least twice. Writing this one article, is a great feat. The backlash will be tiring, and the thought of it makes me want to cry. Thank you both for having the courage to challenge the current mindset. I did notice the nuggets of humor and the cell phone tip. 😂 Thank you both! Mamaw in KY
Thank you for writing this. Although I'm going to have to read this several times to really absorb it. I started questioning my world at a young age. But didn't know where to look to find out why. Then life and abuse got in the way. 35 years later and I have some time. I've learned a lot, but still feel like I am missing something and don't know how or where to look. I think what you're teaching is the next step in my journey. A hiccup for me in this article is the AI aspect. I would have to "trust" the Zoids (watchers) to judge us? AI would have the power through chips in our bodies to determine if we're good or bad? I'll admit that I'm biased against technology because I think it's destroying humanity. I'm only just now seeing some possible advantages. But I am aware I still have a lot more to learn. I'm doing my best to keep an open mind. Breaking through 50+ years of conditioning is not easy. I will keep searching and learning. Thank you for sharing your insights with us.
Regarding trusting the Zoids... Do you have a choice? Has anyone had a choice in the last 6000+ years? I don't think so. Your mileage may vary...
AI and technology are just tools. In the hands of a good person, they are useful to advance Humanity. In the hands of a tyrant, they are incredibly dangerous. The tool isn't the problem -- the people using the tool are the problem.
I have no problem with the idea of there being some super-ordinary entity behind Q and of the Q op being as old as the hills. There is obviously a massive attempt underway to awaken humanity to our scripted reality by presenting us with its spectacle of increasing absurdity.
However, I find your argument for the Zoids and Bird Language unconvincing, especially since reading "The Woman Who Smashed Codes", by Jason Fagone, about the brilliant couple, William Friedman and Elizebeth Smith Friedman, who came to the conclusion that their elaborate decoding proof of a theory was ultimately wrong and they eventually wrote a book about it.
Considering that Q refers often to the NSA, sigint, and declares "We have it all", is it a coincidence that William Friedman is considered by many to be father of the NSA and has been called the world's greatest cryptographer? Yet he and his wife, whose decodes helped win two world wars, concluded they'd been inveigled into a multi-faceted coding error that "proved" the premise Shakespeare's sonnets contain code, inserted by Francis Bacon, declaring himself the actual Shakespeare and bastard son of Queen Elizabeth.
During WWI, the Friedmans were inducted into this decoding proof by the author of the theory and their proofs helped it to become widely-accepted. Just after WWII, they sold their house to research and publish a book explaining the theory's errors, titled "The Shakespeare Ciphers Examined".
So, if the father of the NSA can unwittingly commit a decode error about Shakespeare's language that promotes a false theory with broad implications, it's highly conceivable you're doing the same with Bird Language. William and Elizebeth wrote that if the supporters of their theory had taught themselves to decode, as they ultimately did, the supporters could no longer endorse the theory.
You'll find an ebook copy of "The Woman Who Smashed Codes" at many public libraries and can send it to Kindle, then word search "shakespeare" for the story. You can then select pages from thumbnails of the results.
For a quick cameo, I suggest pp. xi-xii for the references to the decoders' illustrious legacy, pp. 61-62, in which their doubts begin, p. 111-112, describing the first-discovered error, p. 157 where they follow Francis Bacon's (author of "Knowledge itself is power.") credo of an unflinching committment to truth that includes admitting when you're wrong, pp. 321-324 for fuller reflection that led to writing the exposé of themselves, and p. 364 with their observation that learning cryptography destroys the theory they promoted.
"The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined" can be borrowed at Internet Archive:
Only one sample page is offered, unborrowed, in which their bona fides are enumerated.
I think the broad implication of their discovery is highly worthy of further examination. How is it the finest of decoders could unintentionally fabricate an intricate theory plausible to themselves? The decode errors initiating the problem were committed by the theory's author and the decoders had, as yet, no formal training. However, these errors did not impede the co-creation, by these best of deductive minds, of a coherent and elaborately-detailed falsefood. No wonder the "truth is relative" theme, as explored in Luigi Pirandello's play, "It Is So If You Think So" and Akira Kurosawa's film, "Rashomon", is so persistent.
So essentially, you're suggesting that we could be wrong because you've read something that indicates that someone else was sent down an incorrect path in the past. However, you don't even know if the people you're referring to are real.
We started doing what we do because the narratives on the surface don't make sense; not because someone suggested we follow a particular theory. We searched for explanations that do appear to make sense and found one. If you can show reasoning that defeats our assertion(s), please do.
We also have always stated that we might be incorrect and are open to being shown to be wrong with superior patterns.
I look forward to your superior theory and suggest disagreeing without it means nothing to me, especially when your position is based only on what someone else said.
I appreciate your commentary, Kathleen, however I think your analogue is completely irrelevant.
Consider this: Unlike the Friedmans, we didn't start with a premise to prove or disprove. Rather, ours was a progression of curiosity that started with "I, Pet Goat II" and speculation about the origins of Q.
From that jumping off point, we followed a breadcrumb trail of historical observations, music lyrics and other media, esoterica et al to find ourselves at this point.
Could we be wrong? Yep.
But with so many common themes recurring over myriad media (popular and obscure music, children's books and classic literature, current sci-fi and ancient books/myths) over vast spans of time (literally millenia), it would seem mathematically impossible to be coincidental.
Good point about the disparate origins and you may be correct, but I'm not convinced that you are finding a mathematically-impossible number of coincidences. Also, perhaps there are many possible roads to a similar decode error.
I thoroughly concede that the coincidence phenomenon is operating with Q and I recall exo-mythological/archaeological researcher, Paul Wallis, mentioning a matching reference in ancient culture to semi-modern nursery rhyme that appears to imply something similar to your Zoid premise. In his case, it would be ET Zoids, but I don't see that this matters. I'd like to see him pursue that thread.
I'm just not sure bird language fits that bill, especially because, putting my analogy aside, your interpretations seem to me arbitrary, as can often be observed in numerology (you cite Gematria, for instance). But I do say "seem" without the benefit of analysis and I could be wrong; it is, however, a persistent feeling when I read you.
On the theme of coincidence, coincidentally, p. 112 of Smash Codes opens a discussion of Bill Friedman's 1920 paper, "The Index of Coincidence and Its Applications to Cryptography", in which he charts a statistically-predictable number of coincidences particular to each modern language. That makes me wonder if the "statistically impossible" number of coincidences is smaller than we assume.
On another note, not intended as disrespectful, I'm not offended by anything you say, but I find it hard to believe that the Zoids would be as unsophisticated and, frankly, adolescent, in their humor as I think you portray them. You guys can be very funny, but, from my perspective, also sophomoric. When you describe bird language humor, it reminds me very much of your and JF's style, which is hard to chalk off to coincidence. By contrast, the increasingly frequent manifestations of Q humor in service of absurdity, but bereft of bird language interpretation, never strike me as gratuitously crude or irreverent.
I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater here, but I am far less certain than you about the nature of some extraordinary characteristics of Q. However, I do find very convincing your argument for the expedient versus conventional morality of the Zoids, especially with the accumulation of designed disasters that challenge our moral comprehension.
I have noticed a lot of what you pointed out. I realized Q was a comm network when combined with graphics. No one talks about that. Uses alot of bird language. Figured it was AI generated since a sophisticated system was needed to map it all out with graphics. Multiple layers. Looked into the Ingersoll Lockwood hidden stuff a few years back. Decided to pick what I like to work with and forge my own path. People think I'm crazy or it's too complicated for me to explain well.
You're quite a brilliant anal sist my friend; I have to say.
This was thorough and totally expansive. It is appropriately challenging and made me laugh several times. Thanks for your efforts. The apple-pineapple guy was hilarious. That can only be messaging! Nothing else makes sense!
Regarding the Bible, it is stories (narratives) passed down orally until written. I don't believe the world was created in 7 literal days. There are creation stories in my cultures. But early on i heard a good sermon stating that the way Earth was created did not conflict with the creation story. A day or a year or 10,000 years, what is time?? There are 2 creation stories in Genesis. The mystery none of us can solve is how did life begin? Once it did, it kept on going. Many stories do coincide with Middle East history, the Hittites, for example. Stories have moral teaching to pass down. These stories and words of wisdom need to be read again in our schools. I grew up with Bible reading in Philly public schools until it was foolishly stopped. I hope to see it return before I leave this earth. Many expressions in English come from the Bible.--the writing on the wall!!
Q or Zoids, makes no difference what you want to call them. There have been good men trying to get us out of human misery but never strong enough. I read this fall, "The Creature from Jekyll Island." That really opened my eyes from ancient history use of money. And how indebted we are to the banker's Ponzi scheme to make themselves richer, The Fed. Gold will destroy the Fed. I still have a dollar bill silver certificate from before the federal reserve note took over. My parents knew about gold coins that had to be surrendered. Griffin gives 16 suggestions to stop the debt slavery before we can't get out from under its weight. Similar to what I have read DJT wants to do. I believe he is the face of the Q or Zoid plan. Can't wait for Jan 20 to come. I am 77 won't live forever.
Omg!! This is some of the missing pieces I've been looking for!!! Thanks so much for writing about your studies! Fascinating! And, SO FUNNY!
You said Zoids are a group of men. Have you considered they could be woman? The dick pics would make more sense to me then. I mean, if they were men they would be telegraphing in the sky that they are gay and prefer men. No? Maybe? LOL. But, seriously.
Also, are you believing the Zoids influence people to write these songs or do you think Ozzy, David and the Beatles et al are Zoids themselves? I think I might have dated a Zoid once. I know I DEFINITELY dated a King King type but that's a story for a different time! ;D
Would be so interested in finding out where your podcasts are and I look forward to reading more of your studies! So freaking interesting!
There is no rational reason there couldn't be a woman on the "high council" or whatever it is. But, I think it is vanishingly improbable.
Look into the bell curves of IQ. The female IQ bell curve is slightly compressed toward the mean, which is actually a few IQ points higher for women than men.
HOWEVER, at the high end of the IQ scale, the ratio of females approaches zero. In other words, if you look at the top 1% of high IQ Humans, you'll find almost all males.
This is (I believe) the main reason males are the most successful in virtually every category of occupations that benefit from IQ.
Beyond IQ, emotionality (hormones) have a huge effect on the ability to think rationally. Females are at a natural disadvantage.
People might not like what I've just said, but I don't care. I deal in reality.
Interesting. So let me see....you're basing your answer solely on some statistics that were gathered on the humans who currently inhabit our earth at this current time? Hmmm....well if some humans evolved so far ahead of us, I would think they have learned to separate thier emotions from critical thinking by the time they've gotten to that level and wouldn't be at a disadvantage at all. Furthermore, thier apparent need to help humanity evolve would make me lean more toward woman being in charge because that's more of a nurturing attribute. You, yourself, said some men need to be controlled. So, I'm going with Zoids are woman LOL!
Nonetheless, I loved the work you guys have put here. It's awesome and I absolutely love to hear all kinds of options from everyone about how they think the world works.
I'm also basing my understanding on 35 years of running my own high tech company (very high IQ) and having hundreds of employees. There are clear physiological reasons the most complicated professions are dominated by males.
Feel free to come to whatever conclusions you like. The Universe just doesn't care what conclusion you end up with.
I cannot remember where I found that. It was in a document about Essene practices and their belief systems. Sorry I don't have a link to the original document.
Sapioplex is a fag.
11% in my banjo is brim full of rashers so all dangling like dree locks in da lello breeze. Sounds cray Cary coco pops but head Al's resonates also with my grandfather Ala, not to be confused any further that old man I love. I never really dig on the religious melarky truth be told as of all dad men. Truly imbalanced agreed on that fo sure. Maybe a becon on the path not to be followed to one's own grave, unless you have ghost that is. Then you have at least curious and curiouser ding dongs than most No bell lorr ates em for breakfast. I knew that funky croon was barking at the moon y I asked for an audience.,fear is her doom. Fir this is what we all want but yet we consume the very thing at the heart of THE LOOM. I KNOWA THE 1 pertaining personal perr perspective pertaince is in me bones. Crew is most important GOD only knows. I'm not browne nosing or licking frogs spawn but theres a kinda madness to the method if the DICKS WERE WITHDRAWAL... Laters I will cumin again when u know when toodle oo
Too tiits get da flue
Hi Paul I love when you and John are on Joe's show it's mind-blowing .. there's so much that's resonates with me. I am super curious about the zoids - do you have a sub stack on that or any videos that I can check out?
Bird languages next on my list to check out so thanks for posting that.
I noticed the The looks when Joe brought up the Bible, That's going to be a big pill for people to swallow, but it's a book & somebody wrote it my logic is how could everything else be tainted and that be the one thing that stood the test of time without being manipulated. 🤷♀️ So if you have any info where you've done any deep diving on that I would love links for it thanks again you guys are amazing thanks for all your hard work ❤️😎
Kim
Thank you, Kim. Here's a URL to the article we originally wrote about the Zoids.
https://sapioplex.substack.com/p/introducing-the-zoids
Kim con took the bait like all of little faith. God help her poor girl lost so much weight. Alas it is time but we both know that's not true. In the arms of the Creator where all are loved, even u
hi voice. if i may be so bold, i think i might be able to field that "bible" question for you. 1st: change the word somebody to somebodies. and it's qqqqqqqqqqqquite tainted. just like everything else. each book in both tasty-mints had an author. then over time it has been compiled and edited, then reedited to suit the needs or wants of the person funding the new edition. the trick to passing all this off is just like any other magic show. ignorance,.....both imposed, and willful. more so willful today, than as was at one time imposed. but the effect is still the same. the sheep still get fleeced and slaughtered by those that they blindly follow.
2nd: maybe catch up on a couple of authors....mauro biglino, or paul wallis to start. as with any author....take with a grain of salt and add to your base of knowledge. then go at it from there. pretty soon you be just as able to pull the wool over your own eyes as any of us. you won't need an intermediary to commune with that which has been inside you the whole time.
hope this all helps
Hi Russ thank you so much for the comment my apologies for my delayed response I don't get on here much I'm still a newbie. 😎 I completely agree and echoing JFAnon very well said. And I've never been one for looking to someone else for my connection to God source that most definitely is within all of us .. so blessed are we to be alive and part of this Awakening. ❤️🙏🐸
This is an incredibly well written summary of all the disparate shit we've decoded. Bravo, sir.
BTW - have you heard that song by Sarly Cimon "You're so ghey"?
Yor welcome.
Muh crusty underwear!
Firstly, just let me applaud. Once that echo fades, I would like to add all the water and swimming analogies inserted into our modern life narrative. I wholeheartedly or wholeheadedly agree that treading and diving and floating and all the Busby Berkeley narratives begin with dipping a toe in the water and seeing what the temperature is. I can't say I begin to grasp it all. Some of it would be impolite to grasp after all. But I have certainly been paddleboarding around it 90% of my life thus far when I fell over parallel universe theory at age 11 and wondered what all the fuss was about. All these decades later, I still get the brain tickle to kick over a pop culture rock and see what's lurking under it. It really has been fascinating. We are here to run the Gauntlet. Perhaps that's the only reason we chose this gig. And I am cool with that.
I find some of your references correlate with my references. Yes 90125 kicked me in the girl-balls when I was in high school. My other brain tickles were also The Beatles and Electric Light Orchestra. Honestly, I am going to have to read and reread this several times and take notes and then report back. There's just so much out at the margins and I seem to have been chasing it from different angles as you both my whole existence just thinking there was something there but not knowing what. Thanks for giving it a name to refer to. Things have never been what they seem. And there I will end it before I blather on endlessly.
Yeah, it is far too vast of a subject to cover completely. This is really just a springboard to get people started. Everyone's interpretations are going to vary a bit.
Department Of Justice Caught In Conspiracy Against True Living Messiah
I’ve read your musings with interest for some time now. Usually finding myself more confused when done. At least this article starts to bring some reason as to why. I’m gonna have to come back to finish and probably finish a dozen times to understand… my brain hurts. It’s not used to this much exercise. Thanks.
Yeah....the rabbit hole is deeeeep... Good luck!
Not when you are the RABIT
Even though I've followed you guys closely, read every X post, read all your articles twice, watched every video, done a bird language thread with 85 posts, I'm still stunned grasping the full magnitude. Thank you for this article. It should be considered a study guide. Read it twice. Put it in Text2Speach and listen to it at least twice. Writing this one article, is a great feat. The backlash will be tiring, and the thought of it makes me want to cry. Thank you both for having the courage to challenge the current mindset. I did notice the nuggets of humor and the cell phone tip. 😂 Thank you both! Mamaw in KY
Thank you, Donna! Yes...it is a ton of information. There's a lot more, too. It spiders out into everything...
Enjoyed your stack, gave me a flashback from the 80's
Robert Anton Wilson "for the hell of it or what you can get away with"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/z6QYYkYpL5qp
Thank you for writing this. Although I'm going to have to read this several times to really absorb it. I started questioning my world at a young age. But didn't know where to look to find out why. Then life and abuse got in the way. 35 years later and I have some time. I've learned a lot, but still feel like I am missing something and don't know how or where to look. I think what you're teaching is the next step in my journey. A hiccup for me in this article is the AI aspect. I would have to "trust" the Zoids (watchers) to judge us? AI would have the power through chips in our bodies to determine if we're good or bad? I'll admit that I'm biased against technology because I think it's destroying humanity. I'm only just now seeing some possible advantages. But I am aware I still have a lot more to learn. I'm doing my best to keep an open mind. Breaking through 50+ years of conditioning is not easy. I will keep searching and learning. Thank you for sharing your insights with us.
Regarding trusting the Zoids... Do you have a choice? Has anyone had a choice in the last 6000+ years? I don't think so. Your mileage may vary...
AI and technology are just tools. In the hands of a good person, they are useful to advance Humanity. In the hands of a tyrant, they are incredibly dangerous. The tool isn't the problem -- the people using the tool are the problem.
I have no problem with the idea of there being some super-ordinary entity behind Q and of the Q op being as old as the hills. There is obviously a massive attempt underway to awaken humanity to our scripted reality by presenting us with its spectacle of increasing absurdity.
However, I find your argument for the Zoids and Bird Language unconvincing, especially since reading "The Woman Who Smashed Codes", by Jason Fagone, about the brilliant couple, William Friedman and Elizebeth Smith Friedman, who came to the conclusion that their elaborate decoding proof of a theory was ultimately wrong and they eventually wrote a book about it.
Considering that Q refers often to the NSA, sigint, and declares "We have it all", is it a coincidence that William Friedman is considered by many to be father of the NSA and has been called the world's greatest cryptographer? Yet he and his wife, whose decodes helped win two world wars, concluded they'd been inveigled into a multi-faceted coding error that "proved" the premise Shakespeare's sonnets contain code, inserted by Francis Bacon, declaring himself the actual Shakespeare and bastard son of Queen Elizabeth.
During WWI, the Friedmans were inducted into this decoding proof by the author of the theory and their proofs helped it to become widely-accepted. Just after WWII, they sold their house to research and publish a book explaining the theory's errors, titled "The Shakespeare Ciphers Examined".
So, if the father of the NSA can unwittingly commit a decode error about Shakespeare's language that promotes a false theory with broad implications, it's highly conceivable you're doing the same with Bird Language. William and Elizebeth wrote that if the supporters of their theory had taught themselves to decode, as they ultimately did, the supporters could no longer endorse the theory.
You'll find an ebook copy of "The Woman Who Smashed Codes" at many public libraries and can send it to Kindle, then word search "shakespeare" for the story. You can then select pages from thumbnails of the results.
For a quick cameo, I suggest pp. xi-xii for the references to the decoders' illustrious legacy, pp. 61-62, in which their doubts begin, p. 111-112, describing the first-discovered error, p. 157 where they follow Francis Bacon's (author of "Knowledge itself is power.") credo of an unflinching committment to truth that includes admitting when you're wrong, pp. 321-324 for fuller reflection that led to writing the exposé of themselves, and p. 364 with their observation that learning cryptography destroys the theory they promoted.
"The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined" can be borrowed at Internet Archive:
https://archive.org/details/shakespeareancip00frie
Only one sample page is offered, unborrowed, in which their bona fides are enumerated.
I think the broad implication of their discovery is highly worthy of further examination. How is it the finest of decoders could unintentionally fabricate an intricate theory plausible to themselves? The decode errors initiating the problem were committed by the theory's author and the decoders had, as yet, no formal training. However, these errors did not impede the co-creation, by these best of deductive minds, of a coherent and elaborately-detailed falsefood. No wonder the "truth is relative" theme, as explored in Luigi Pirandello's play, "It Is So If You Think So" and Akira Kurosawa's film, "Rashomon", is so persistent.
So essentially, you're suggesting that we could be wrong because you've read something that indicates that someone else was sent down an incorrect path in the past. However, you don't even know if the people you're referring to are real.
We started doing what we do because the narratives on the surface don't make sense; not because someone suggested we follow a particular theory. We searched for explanations that do appear to make sense and found one. If you can show reasoning that defeats our assertion(s), please do.
We also have always stated that we might be incorrect and are open to being shown to be wrong with superior patterns.
I look forward to your superior theory and suggest disagreeing without it means nothing to me, especially when your position is based only on what someone else said.
I appreciate your commentary, Kathleen, however I think your analogue is completely irrelevant.
Consider this: Unlike the Friedmans, we didn't start with a premise to prove or disprove. Rather, ours was a progression of curiosity that started with "I, Pet Goat II" and speculation about the origins of Q.
From that jumping off point, we followed a breadcrumb trail of historical observations, music lyrics and other media, esoterica et al to find ourselves at this point.
Could we be wrong? Yep.
But with so many common themes recurring over myriad media (popular and obscure music, children's books and classic literature, current sci-fi and ancient books/myths) over vast spans of time (literally millenia), it would seem mathematically impossible to be coincidental.
Good point about the disparate origins and you may be correct, but I'm not convinced that you are finding a mathematically-impossible number of coincidences. Also, perhaps there are many possible roads to a similar decode error.
I thoroughly concede that the coincidence phenomenon is operating with Q and I recall exo-mythological/archaeological researcher, Paul Wallis, mentioning a matching reference in ancient culture to semi-modern nursery rhyme that appears to imply something similar to your Zoid premise. In his case, it would be ET Zoids, but I don't see that this matters. I'd like to see him pursue that thread.
I'm just not sure bird language fits that bill, especially because, putting my analogy aside, your interpretations seem to me arbitrary, as can often be observed in numerology (you cite Gematria, for instance). But I do say "seem" without the benefit of analysis and I could be wrong; it is, however, a persistent feeling when I read you.
On the theme of coincidence, coincidentally, p. 112 of Smash Codes opens a discussion of Bill Friedman's 1920 paper, "The Index of Coincidence and Its Applications to Cryptography", in which he charts a statistically-predictable number of coincidences particular to each modern language. That makes me wonder if the "statistically impossible" number of coincidences is smaller than we assume.
On another note, not intended as disrespectful, I'm not offended by anything you say, but I find it hard to believe that the Zoids would be as unsophisticated and, frankly, adolescent, in their humor as I think you portray them. You guys can be very funny, but, from my perspective, also sophomoric. When you describe bird language humor, it reminds me very much of your and JF's style, which is hard to chalk off to coincidence. By contrast, the increasingly frequent manifestations of Q humor in service of absurdity, but bereft of bird language interpretation, never strike me as gratuitously crude or irreverent.
I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater here, but I am far less certain than you about the nature of some extraordinary characteristics of Q. However, I do find very convincing your argument for the expedient versus conventional morality of the Zoids, especially with the accumulation of designed disasters that challenge our moral comprehension.
I have noticed a lot of what you pointed out. I realized Q was a comm network when combined with graphics. No one talks about that. Uses alot of bird language. Figured it was AI generated since a sophisticated system was needed to map it all out with graphics. Multiple layers. Looked into the Ingersoll Lockwood hidden stuff a few years back. Decided to pick what I like to work with and forge my own path. People think I'm crazy or it's too complicated for me to explain well.
Yeah, we don't think most of the population is capable of getting their heads around this completely. But the world needs ditch diggers...
I was hoping for something to communicate with actual BIRDS. What a Rip Off
Wow. That took me a hot minute to get through!
You're quite a brilliant anal sist my friend; I have to say.
This was thorough and totally expansive. It is appropriately challenging and made me laugh several times. Thanks for your efforts. The apple-pineapple guy was hilarious. That can only be messaging! Nothing else makes sense!
Why thank you, my Aussie friend!
Regarding the Bible, it is stories (narratives) passed down orally until written. I don't believe the world was created in 7 literal days. There are creation stories in my cultures. But early on i heard a good sermon stating that the way Earth was created did not conflict with the creation story. A day or a year or 10,000 years, what is time?? There are 2 creation stories in Genesis. The mystery none of us can solve is how did life begin? Once it did, it kept on going. Many stories do coincide with Middle East history, the Hittites, for example. Stories have moral teaching to pass down. These stories and words of wisdom need to be read again in our schools. I grew up with Bible reading in Philly public schools until it was foolishly stopped. I hope to see it return before I leave this earth. Many expressions in English come from the Bible.--the writing on the wall!!
Q or Zoids, makes no difference what you want to call them. There have been good men trying to get us out of human misery but never strong enough. I read this fall, "The Creature from Jekyll Island." That really opened my eyes from ancient history use of money. And how indebted we are to the banker's Ponzi scheme to make themselves richer, The Fed. Gold will destroy the Fed. I still have a dollar bill silver certificate from before the federal reserve note took over. My parents knew about gold coins that had to be surrendered. Griffin gives 16 suggestions to stop the debt slavery before we can't get out from under its weight. Similar to what I have read DJT wants to do. I believe he is the face of the Q or Zoid plan. Can't wait for Jan 20 to come. I am 77 won't live forever.
Omg!! This is some of the missing pieces I've been looking for!!! Thanks so much for writing about your studies! Fascinating! And, SO FUNNY!
You said Zoids are a group of men. Have you considered they could be woman? The dick pics would make more sense to me then. I mean, if they were men they would be telegraphing in the sky that they are gay and prefer men. No? Maybe? LOL. But, seriously.
Also, are you believing the Zoids influence people to write these songs or do you think Ozzy, David and the Beatles et al are Zoids themselves? I think I might have dated a Zoid once. I know I DEFINITELY dated a King King type but that's a story for a different time! ;D
Would be so interested in finding out where your podcasts are and I look forward to reading more of your studies! So freaking interesting!
Thank you so much!
Ok, so this is kinda funny.
There is no rational reason there couldn't be a woman on the "high council" or whatever it is. But, I think it is vanishingly improbable.
Look into the bell curves of IQ. The female IQ bell curve is slightly compressed toward the mean, which is actually a few IQ points higher for women than men.
HOWEVER, at the high end of the IQ scale, the ratio of females approaches zero. In other words, if you look at the top 1% of high IQ Humans, you'll find almost all males.
This is (I believe) the main reason males are the most successful in virtually every category of occupations that benefit from IQ.
Beyond IQ, emotionality (hormones) have a huge effect on the ability to think rationally. Females are at a natural disadvantage.
People might not like what I've just said, but I don't care. I deal in reality.
Interesting. So let me see....you're basing your answer solely on some statistics that were gathered on the humans who currently inhabit our earth at this current time? Hmmm....well if some humans evolved so far ahead of us, I would think they have learned to separate thier emotions from critical thinking by the time they've gotten to that level and wouldn't be at a disadvantage at all. Furthermore, thier apparent need to help humanity evolve would make me lean more toward woman being in charge because that's more of a nurturing attribute. You, yourself, said some men need to be controlled. So, I'm going with Zoids are woman LOL!
Nonetheless, I loved the work you guys have put here. It's awesome and I absolutely love to hear all kinds of options from everyone about how they think the world works.
I'm also basing my understanding on 35 years of running my own high tech company (very high IQ) and having hundreds of employees. There are clear physiological reasons the most complicated professions are dominated by males.
Feel free to come to whatever conclusions you like. The Universe just doesn't care what conclusion you end up with.
Great read tho! Thanks!
Human nature when deprived of basic care will grab the lowest hanging fruit to revive the living waters.
Who cares?
ALICE IN WODERLAND
NOT WHITE SNOW AND HER MIG FESTUS PAUL,
"I'LL END YOU" Mcgee
By no means a father Take it from me. How you treat God's children will be the debt of thee. You got your wish*
You are infamous can't you see? You've been Q'd, You go down I. HISTORY
Q+Q+THE FREE WORLD WWG1WGA GODSPEED 🙏✨👌👌👌😘😘😘😁😁😁🤣😎💋
I cannot remember where I found that. It was in a document about Essene practices and their belief systems. Sorry I don't have a link to the original document.
https://www.nytimes.com/1979/08/30/archives/a-tale-of-carter-and-the-killer-rabbit-president-orders-photograph.html