This was a brilliantly entertaining argument against "Karmic Retribution." While I did not believe in it before reading, I thought it would be interesting to bias confirm for a bit as I have not EVER come across an argument against this topic. I was not disappointed. I did not believe in satanism prior to reading this article either. I thought it was just a trend-whore poser thing sold to teenagers and misfits at hot topic. However, if Satanism was a thing, it makes sense that it would have only one rule. And to obey any other rule outside of that one rule would be ridiculous as it would void rule 1. I have considered that before plenty. I give this article 5 stars-- Would read again.
That invention would have to be on the order of the mechanical printing press and/or the invention of photography which would allow the mass production and distribution of images and periodicals and books.
Dec 11, 2023·edited Dec 11, 2023Liked by Sapioplex
But your time frame was before 1850? AI existed then? I would have thought the ability of people to capture real images and preserve them for the future would complicate the cabal's manipulation of history. I am honored that you commented on my post. Your work (and others) show the genius of our Creator's work. Humankind can work together to solve problems and pass the solutions on to their children thus creating a next level launch point for His creation.
Ah! I see your comment was on the phonograph article and not the AI article - this is my error. I'm sorry.
And yes, the difference between the phonograph (phonautograph) and the printing press / photography is the dynamic of how sound works in a courtroom. Photography could also be disruptive, but not like audio. A still image in 1850 was difficult to obtain and didn't express time. Audio expressed time and would reproduce speech.
So yes, this was similar to the printing press and the photograph. Both the good guys and bad guys had to control it. But it wasn't as black and white as AI was, which came later.
Wow, so this theory makes the most sense. When something like this paints the most confusing topics in history in a clearer light, it MUST be closer to the truth than previously perceived. Thank you! Been following you low key for a few years, I think I first heard of you back in the Trump/Q days like 2019ish, but your Pershavelt theory has really drawn me in.
This was a brilliantly entertaining argument against "Karmic Retribution." While I did not believe in it before reading, I thought it would be interesting to bias confirm for a bit as I have not EVER come across an argument against this topic. I was not disappointed. I did not believe in satanism prior to reading this article either. I thought it was just a trend-whore poser thing sold to teenagers and misfits at hot topic. However, if Satanism was a thing, it makes sense that it would have only one rule. And to obey any other rule outside of that one rule would be ridiculous as it would void rule 1. I have considered that before plenty. I give this article 5 stars-- Would read again.
Thank you, Allegra.
That invention would have to be on the order of the mechanical printing press and/or the invention of photography which would allow the mass production and distribution of images and periodicals and books.
AI is far more dangerous to the cabal than anything before it. Books and photos cannot find patterns of crime in a sea of data.
But your time frame was before 1850? AI existed then? I would have thought the ability of people to capture real images and preserve them for the future would complicate the cabal's manipulation of history. I am honored that you commented on my post. Your work (and others) show the genius of our Creator's work. Humankind can work together to solve problems and pass the solutions on to their children thus creating a next level launch point for His creation.
Ah! I see your comment was on the phonograph article and not the AI article - this is my error. I'm sorry.
And yes, the difference between the phonograph (phonautograph) and the printing press / photography is the dynamic of how sound works in a courtroom. Photography could also be disruptive, but not like audio. A still image in 1850 was difficult to obtain and didn't express time. Audio expressed time and would reproduce speech.
So yes, this was similar to the printing press and the photograph. Both the good guys and bad guys had to control it. But it wasn't as black and white as AI was, which came later.
Wow, so this theory makes the most sense. When something like this paints the most confusing topics in history in a clearer light, it MUST be closer to the truth than previously perceived. Thank you! Been following you low key for a few years, I think I first heard of you back in the Trump/Q days like 2019ish, but your Pershavelt theory has really drawn me in.
I became visible first on Truth Social in April, 2022. Time flies!