Why Karmic Retribution Is False
Criminals Need a Spotlight
This article is supporting information for The Pershivelt Theory.
Standard preamble: (1) These are my opinions and nothing more. I could be wrong about every single assertion I make. Deal with it. (2) Do your own research and come to your own conclusions like a functional adult.
My Prediction For This Article
Most people reading this believe in karmic retribution and I will assume here that you are one of them. You believe in karmic retribution as you read these words, and by the end of this article, you will believe it not to be true. You will have realized you were very cleverly misled. Then, you will start to question everything you thought you knew about everything because you will realize how easily you were deceived. (Or, you’ll miss the point of this article and continue to believe everything you’re told — your choice.)
My intention is to slap people with this fish in order to teach them how to think at a higher level. Everyone needs to learn just how little they actually know compared to how much they think they know.
Don’t take this as an insult. Learn from it.
Let us begin.
What is “Karmic Retribution”?
Karmic retribution is a term given to a supposed Satanic practice where the perpetrator of a planned crime must tell its victims what it is going to do before they do it. It is said in many, many sources that this practice is done by Satanists.
People who have done a lot of research on Satanism will tell you this is the case. “The evidence is all around you!”, they say.
How to Discern Truth in a Field of Lies
Many books say karmic retribution is a thing that Satanists must do. It is one of their unbreakable rules. Uncountable articles say this is true. Even more videos of well known personalities online tell you this is true.
“Everyone wouldn’t be saying it is true if it isn’t!” — This is one of the most common fallacies of logical thinking. Consensus is a terrible measure of reality. Science is the only known method of determining truth, and Science doesn’t even prove truth — it proves things not to be true.
So everyone agrees that karmic retribution is a thing.
But is it?
Who told you that?
If so, why would it be true?
If not, why would it not be true?
How can you tell?
The only way to know for sure is to…
In order to understand this, you need to actually think. This means don’t trust what everyone else says. Instead, think it through and determine if YOU believe it makes sense.
What if everyone else is wrong?
I intend to destroy this stupid karmic retribution trope once and for all, not only because it gives me an opportunity to mock those who don’t think, but also because it is one of the most brilliant lies of all time.
The Death Cult’s Rules
If you are not familiar with the origin of the Death Cult, please see my write-up about their origins at https://sapioplex.substack.com/p/how-did-satanists-rule-the-world.
Interestingly, mixed in with documents that tell you that karmic retribution is a real phenomenon, you’ll also find information clearly telling you that Satanists have exactly one rule, and one rule only:
What should be obvious — even this early on in this logic smackdown — is that this is ONE RULE. Most of the documents even say this unequivocally!
How could there be another rule if there is only one rule and this is it? (There couldn’t. “Duh.”)
What this rule means is that the only thing that matters is whether or not you are the survivor of whatever situation you are in. What you do affects this, so make your choice; do what you’re going to do and Natural Law will be applied. Whoever survives wins.
What is Natural Law? Natural law is simply the law of nature. It states that things live, things die, stuff happens and that’s that. Morality is just something that affects behavior in groups, so honoring it is one viable strategy, but so too is dishonoring it another strategy.
The Satanists believe that you should use whatever strategy gets you what you want overall. This may include things that are immoral. Whatever works, right?
So why, then, would they also have some weird religious affinity for a rule that they have to tell their victims about what they’re doing because they think it gives them more power?
They don’t. It would only weaken them.
Think about it: If you were running a secret death cult, how retarded would you have to be to come up with a rule that exposes you to your victims? These people are psychopaths, but they’re not stupid. The answer to this question is that they would have to be so retarded so as to not be capable of even spelling “death cult.”
Secrecy Is Critical For The Death Cult
In my earlier article about the origins of secret societies and Satanism, I mentioned that one of the critical limiting factors of the evil secret societies is secrecy. Without absolute secrecy, the death cult would crumble very quickly against an informed population. This is because there are far more good (moral) people than criminals. (I believe the ratio to be roughly 1:2 in the current social environment, which may be why that ratio exists in the legends about Lucifer’s fall from Heaven. It may also be the reason 666 exists — it is 2/3rds of 1000. In the future, that ratio may change for reasons that are beyond the scope of this essay.)
Simply put, if people know what the death cult does, the death cult goes bye-bye and lots of death cult people die at the hands of good people.
Why then, would Satanists come up with a rule that says they have to tell their victims what they intend to do to them?
How Stupid Is This Rule?
At the risk of beating this dead horse into a fine French paté, let’s examine the claims more closely:
The cult allegedly has to inform the victims of their intentions, but they can do it in coded messaging. Let’s put this to the test. Here’s a coded message that tells you that I am going to steal your lunchbox tomorrow at 7:36PM:
Did you get it?
“But wait!” you say. “That’s not clear enough!”
Who judges how clear the message needs to be? Weren’t you able to understand the complex steganography I used to encode my hashed data into that image? As one of the editors of the PNG file format (true story), I cleverly made sure of the ability to include arbitrary data packets into the PNG file format just so I could someday write this article and include extra data that you can’t see because you didn’t know there were arbitrary data packets in PNG files! (Just kidding, I have no idea if there are arbitrary data packets in that PNG file. And I don’t care.)
Is there a Satanic committee somewhere who decides how clear a notification needs to be? What happens if someone doesn’t notify their victims well enough? Do they just lose street cred with the magic demons? Or do they get a spanking?
If the receiver of information doesn’t realize they are receiving information, is there any information there? (This, by the way, is one answer to the question “If a tree falls in a forest but there’s nobody there to hear it, does it make a sound?”)
The whole claim is just stupid. Criminals don’t broadcast their intentions. It would be a practice that would only serve to weaken them. When playing games with life and death, the best way to win is to minimize your weaknesses.
The Greatest Lie Ever Told (Maybe…)
So why did this absurd trope get started?
Since ancient times, the wise people in the secret societies had a notion of dualism, which they believed was immutable (unable to be changed.) Dualism states that in order to have good or evil, you must have the other. A balance between the two should be sought and there would always be a power struggle between the two. This was considered natural and unchanging.
Between 1807 and the 1850s, something remarkable happened. A device was invented that shocked these powerful, wealthy people to the core. It caused a situation which would forever change the philosophy of the elite. As soon as they realized the implications of this device, they knew that dualism was incorrect and that either overwhelming good or overwhelming bad would be the result. This is the origin of the bizarre happenings we see today.
(I’m intentionally not telling you what the invented device was because I’m coy like that. It is part of my charm. Embrace the disappointment.)
In any case, in 1865, Lewis Carroll published Alice in Wonderland, one of the most popular children’s books of all time. My avatar is an image of Alice.
Alice in Wonderland is an educational tool that can be used by parents to teach their children about how the death cult operates. I believe it was written for parents to read it to their children and to add extra information explaining what each thing actually means. It requires the reader to know these things, which aren’t easy to figure out if you’re not taught these things as a child. I’ve been able to figure many of these things out myself, which is how I derived this theory.
If the death cult controlled everything in the media, then Alice in Wonderland would not have become one of the most popular children’s books of all time. This means the good guys controlled enough of the publishing space and promotional space to make this book very, very visible.
The bad guys (Satanists) would not have liked this book at all. I mean, they would have hated it. They would kill people over it. And yet, there it is.
Six years later in 1871, Albert Pike published Morals and Dogma.
In this book, Albert Pike says he (and all Masons) secretly worship Lucifer. This proves he’s a Satanist, right?
Wait a minute. Albert Pike was one of the most respected generals in the Civil War and a very accomplished man. He allegedly became acquainted with Masonry in 1840 and rose to the 33rd level and was the Supreme Grandmaster of the Southern Scottish Rite in the United States.
So in 1840, Albert Pike becomes a Mason. Then in 1865, Lewis Carroll writes Alice in Wonderland, exposing the upside down world of Satanism. Then in 1871, we have Albert Pike, now one of the highest ranking members of Masonry telling the world that Masons secretly worship Lucifer.
Interestingly, Albert Pike would have been one of the hardest people to kill after the Civil War. He was a highly respected general in the Confederate army. (The Satanists couldn’t kill him if they couldn’t get at him.)
That’s an interesting pattern. Let’s see if it continues…
Let’s talk about Aleister Crowley.
So Aleister Crowley comes along in 1907 and forms a secret group called “A∴A∴” (A therefore, A therefore.) It was some weird magical organization. Then in 1912, he joined Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO), which was a secret society. The Satanism was oozing out of him, so the story goes.
I want you to look at the photo above and ask yourself what the public relations department of Satanism would think about it.
The correct answer is that Satanism doesn’t have a public relations department. These are secret societies! Get it? They’re SECRET.
They don’t put out photos like this! This photo makes them look INSANE.
Satanists would never do this.
Later, we have people writing tons of books about how crazy Aleister Crowley was. We have Ozzy Osbourne writing songs about they crazy Aleister Crowley.
If anything, Aleister Crowley was a weapon against the Satanists!
Read that again. Aleister Crowley was a weapon against the Satanists.
Let’s touch on Anton LeVey.
I get shivers when I look at this obviously genuine Satanist. No, I’m just kidding. What a freakin’ buffoon! Does anyone actually think his Church of Satan and Satanic Bible were legit? If you do, you have problems.
And finally, for the last buffoon in our repertoires, here is Michael Aquino.
Michael Aquino famously went on the Oprah Winfrey Show looking like an absolute freak show espousing how he was an active officer in naval intelligence and also an active Satanist. I have a hint for you: You aren’t an active officer in naval intelligence if you’re a satanist. And you certainly don’t go on the Oprah show wearing unbelievably obnoxious hair dye making you look like you should be on the Munsters.
There are countless other examples and they get more and more common, especially after 1960 when the media literally exploded with Satanism.
Alice in Wonderland, Albert Pike, Aleister Crowley, Anton LeVey and Michael Aquino were, I believe, propaganda efforts to shine a bright light on Satanists. And it worked.
The one thing the Satanists can never allow is that the public should know of their existence or methods. And here were prominent figures and media describing exactly what they do. And they were becoming more and more common and more and more stupid.
Someone was exposing the Satanists. That someone is Q, and it started as early as 1865. (I can feel many readers recoiling with cognitive dissonance at this moment because they believe Q started in 2017. Be careful what you think you know. Relax and remember not to have beliefs for which you have little to no supporting facts.)
In order to defeat the Satanists, the good guys had to come up with a way to get the people to stand up to Satanism. But how could this be done when the people don’t know that Satanism exists? As one looks back in history, it is very, very difficult to find detailed evidence of Satanism before 1865. Go ahead - try. You’ll find information, but it is incredibly rare. After 1865, it becomes much more common until in the mid 1900’s, it is everywhere. This is not an accident — it is the work of Q — the good guys.
The good guys had to show the public what Satanism was. To do this, they pretended to be bad guys acting like Satanists. Albert Pike was likely a good guy, willingly lying and telling everyone he worshiped Lucifer. He may have infiltrated the Masons just to get to the highest levels so he could sabotage their efforts. We may never know.
Aleister Crowley was similarly likely a good guy, running around and making Satanists look like buffoons, but making sure everyone knew they exist.
Anton LeVey was likely a good guy. Michael Aquino, too.
Making more sense now?
You were lied to in order to get you familiar with Satanism. Now you know about it.
I included this Rudy Giuliani image from a very serious press conference he did where hair dye ran down his face. I’ve dyed my hair before and what you see in this photo just isn’t possible by any thinking person. You’re looking at Q again, fibbing to you for your own benefit.
The only reason you know about Satanism is because Q told you about it. Q did this by lying to you.
Now you know why there aren’t tons of photographs of important people from the 1800s and early 1900s with the OK sign over their eyes. Because Satanists don’t broadcast their presence. But there are thousands of them from the last 60 years. That’s because Q has been lying to you.
Karmic retribution is Q lying to you so you’ll pay attention to Satanism.
And it worked.
Conclusion
By now, you should be firmly in the place where you understand that karmic retribution was all bullshit. Like lying about the tooth fairy or Santa Claus, Q had to teach the kids a lesson and tell some multi-generational fibs.
When I began, I said you would stop believing in karmic retribution. Did I succeed? (Honestly, if you don’t think I did, don’t bother commenting. I’m not going to take you seriously; nor should anyone else.)
If I did succeed, what will you do?
Will you question everything you THINK you know?
You should.
- sapioplex
This was a brilliantly entertaining argument against "Karmic Retribution." While I did not believe in it before reading, I thought it would be interesting to bias confirm for a bit as I have not EVER come across an argument against this topic. I was not disappointed. I did not believe in satanism prior to reading this article either. I thought it was just a trend-whore poser thing sold to teenagers and misfits at hot topic. However, if Satanism was a thing, it makes sense that it would have only one rule. And to obey any other rule outside of that one rule would be ridiculous as it would void rule 1. I have considered that before plenty. I give this article 5 stars-- Would read again.
That invention would have to be on the order of the mechanical printing press and/or the invention of photography which would allow the mass production and distribution of images and periodicals and books.