Great article Paul and JF Anon. Now I have 100 new questions. 😂
The wars seem to contradict this unless over population could cause extinction. But then we killed off the ones who got up and did something and we kept the couch potatoes. 🤔😵💫
Destructive as it is, war presents opportunities. Think long term. Would a dominating military be useful to WH? Absent war, how would such a thing be accomplished, especially in the isolationist context of the time (both times, actually)?
deception is also a major attribute. why was the northern flank of France left completely unprotected by the Maginot line? Why did the japanese military pour thousands into waiting machine guns, why did hitler turn away from the oil fields and Moscow when they were in view? military occupation provides an iron curtain for narrative and information control.
What's wrong with being under the bus? Indiana Jones did it, albeit it wasn't a bus but a German troop transport. And if I recall correctly, ol' Indiana took control of that transport.
come to think of it… My dodge is a diesel, just like those transports, and they were in a very unpopulated area similar to Wyoming. maybe i should go by deserttransport instead… I think you’re on to something.
Exactly! Indy survived to tell the tale! I threw my kids under the bus many times! How else do they “grow” and learn to think responsibly? In fact when my son and his friends skipped school to play video games all day, at my house….🙄, I came home from work to the principal at my door. Their punishment which I thought was fitting….they got to WASH the BUS(es)! All of them. Love the article, and the humor…keep it coming!
This explains what we're seeing with the Q sting. Very satisfying. I saw you on Rambo with JFAnon the day after I'd emailed someone that we needed more info on the metaphysics of Q. Will continue to watch and read you both. Your new Merovingian fan.
Dec. 5 I emailed someone involved in Radu Cinamar's Transylvanian book series that I think there might be congruence between those books and Q. I said I'd like to see someone explain the metaphysics of Q since most of what we hear is sociopolitical, but there's an obvious cosmology behind Q.
Dec. 6 I watched Paul and JFAnon, for the first time, on Rambo, which was like a genie answering a wish. I wrote back to my original correspondent about the interview, saying I was about to start book 4 of the series, "The Secret Parchment" and would see if anything seemed to match with what Paul and JF said. Meanwhile, I read this substack.
Last night, I read in book 4, counsel given by one person to another. Is it a match?:
"... Of course, in many cases, what is bad is actually good. But it is also true that this analysis can shock some people who have made a unilateral idea about God because people associate God only with what is good and beautiful without being capable of understanding the hidden significance of the fact that great divinities also love obscurity.
"And what is the hidden significance?" I asked.
Have patience. The statement is paradoxical; and it implies the fact some divinities are highly above the domain of good and evil and that is why they are detached from these dual aspects." ...
"... Of course, we cannot state under any circumstances that God is evil, but for us it is wise to understand that we can discover God even in the existence of evil. This truth represents a great conceptual barrier for most people and this is why they fail in life so many times.
"And how would this be better understood?" I asked ...
"It is very important not to forget for a single moment that God always, in every second, is everything. This will help you quickly get rid of the dualist idea that both good and evil are absolute." ...
"The statement that God, in reality, can be discovered and felt like supreme goodness, even in what is evil, expresses in its essence the idea that the evil which appears is not absolute evil and that, as a consequence, it does not oppose good absolutely." ...
I remembered a significant quote from the great Hindi epic, "The Mahabarata" ... A great wise man, who had realized the Supreme Truth, gives the following advice: "Renounce good and evil now, renounce truth and lie; and after that, renouncing all of these completely, finally renounce the act of renouncing itself."
This idea is expressed in the Kata-Upanishad when the hero, Nashiketas, asks Yama, who is the deity of the realm of the dead, "O Yama, tell me, I beg of you, what is in reality beyond good and evil?"
I guess doing the “right” thing always has the risk of collateral damage. You choose the lesser evil for the best good outcome. It’s difficult being human and juggling emotional and logical thinking. It’s the Spock dilemma.
Ironically, the Spock character regularly showed that he didn't take emotional thinking into account but was rational in every other way. This overall behavior isn't logical, because to ignore certain possibilities -- irrational or not -- is irrational.
Methinks that days long, highly annoying thread last week that truly was getting on my last nerve after being unfortunate enough to be tagged on each and every reply, was an experiment...research re: humanity and how far they’d go to be right!
true (and here comes the but…) there has not been a major blood letting war since its inception. Major down sides of course, emotional raging being one, but on the flip, it makes projection much easier and highly efficient. i suppose it would be like a big pile of cow shit you use to fertilize your vegetable garden. I suppose that’s the idealist in me though.
Very interesting read and theory. I have a different theory. I believe we are in the battle between life and death energies. Death energies live on death and debilitation. The opposite is synergistic energy, life energy, regenerative energy. When we intend to kill our own that means we go against our biological imperative which is to build/favor our own species. Every species does that. Yet we kill our own species systematically. I posit that pedophilia is a symptom of this action (of killing our own species). If we abhorred every intention of killing as a solution to anything, (except in the most rare cases - because nothing is absolute, which raises a conundrum - therefore if nothing is absolute, there must be exceptions to that too) It gets a bit hairy, but intending death to solve problems, only increases the magnitude of the death energies, it's becoming like them, which they actually love to see. If we rather always look for solutions that do not intend death (or taking something down) the power of that would outweigh (I posit) the power of the violent energies. We just haven't tried anything other, so we don't know...
"I know the name of that smiter [i.e., Medjed] among them who belongs to the House of Osiris, who shoots with his eyes, yet is unseen. The sky is encircled with the fiery blast of his mouth and Hāpi makes report, yet he is unseen."
This idiot has totally lost his mind this time.
What a phag. Disappointing.
Pound salt, fucker.
You've addressed nothing to explain why you think that. Opinions without backing are just hollow opinions.
You're a phag
Takes one to know one, pederast.
Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yer?
See the løveli lakes
The wonderful telephøne system
And mani interesting furry animals
Glad I read this a second time. totally missed the part in the post script about JFanon being ghey.
Yeah, he's a total fag.
A møøse once bit my sister
Great article Paul and JF Anon. Now I have 100 new questions. 😂
The wars seem to contradict this unless over population could cause extinction. But then we killed off the ones who got up and did something and we kept the couch potatoes. 🤔😵💫
Remember that the Prussians gained enormous amounts of power before they could be put down. Evil rears its ugly head and causes damage.
True, it needs to be kept in check. Thanks!
Destructive as it is, war presents opportunities. Think long term. Would a dominating military be useful to WH? Absent war, how would such a thing be accomplished, especially in the isolationist context of the time (both times, actually)?
deception is also a major attribute. why was the northern flank of France left completely unprotected by the Maginot line? Why did the japanese military pour thousands into waiting machine guns, why did hitler turn away from the oil fields and Moscow when they were in view? military occupation provides an iron curtain for narrative and information control.
I'm MamawInKy on X and Rumble
Thanks for explaining. Woman thinking, makes it hard to wrap my head around it.
excellent work guys. defender threw jfanon under the bus on truth which makes it even better!!
What's wrong with being under the bus? Indiana Jones did it, albeit it wasn't a bus but a German troop transport. And if I recall correctly, ol' Indiana took control of that transport.
I welcome being forced under the bus.
come to think of it… My dodge is a diesel, just like those transports, and they were in a very unpopulated area similar to Wyoming. maybe i should go by deserttransport instead… I think you’re on to something.
Exactly! Indy survived to tell the tale! I threw my kids under the bus many times! How else do they “grow” and learn to think responsibly? In fact when my son and his friends skipped school to play video games all day, at my house….🙄, I came home from work to the principal at my door. Their punishment which I thought was fitting….they got to WASH the BUS(es)! All of them. Love the article, and the humor…keep it coming!
Thank you Jeff!
Soon we'll start throwing our commenters under the bus! (Out of love, of course...)
Knitting my under the bus hammock now. 😳
im already under the bus
Makes complete sense ❤️
This makes sense. Someone has to move and remove the chess pieces.
This explains what we're seeing with the Q sting. Very satisfying. I saw you on Rambo with JFAnon the day after I'd emailed someone that we needed more info on the metaphysics of Q. Will continue to watch and read you both. Your new Merovingian fan.
Dec. 5 I emailed someone involved in Radu Cinamar's Transylvanian book series that I think there might be congruence between those books and Q. I said I'd like to see someone explain the metaphysics of Q since most of what we hear is sociopolitical, but there's an obvious cosmology behind Q.
Dec. 6 I watched Paul and JFAnon, for the first time, on Rambo, which was like a genie answering a wish. I wrote back to my original correspondent about the interview, saying I was about to start book 4 of the series, "The Secret Parchment" and would see if anything seemed to match with what Paul and JF said. Meanwhile, I read this substack.
Last night, I read in book 4, counsel given by one person to another. Is it a match?:
"... Of course, in many cases, what is bad is actually good. But it is also true that this analysis can shock some people who have made a unilateral idea about God because people associate God only with what is good and beautiful without being capable of understanding the hidden significance of the fact that great divinities also love obscurity.
"And what is the hidden significance?" I asked.
Have patience. The statement is paradoxical; and it implies the fact some divinities are highly above the domain of good and evil and that is why they are detached from these dual aspects." ...
"... Of course, we cannot state under any circumstances that God is evil, but for us it is wise to understand that we can discover God even in the existence of evil. This truth represents a great conceptual barrier for most people and this is why they fail in life so many times.
"And how would this be better understood?" I asked ...
"It is very important not to forget for a single moment that God always, in every second, is everything. This will help you quickly get rid of the dualist idea that both good and evil are absolute." ...
"The statement that God, in reality, can be discovered and felt like supreme goodness, even in what is evil, expresses in its essence the idea that the evil which appears is not absolute evil and that, as a consequence, it does not oppose good absolutely." ...
I remembered a significant quote from the great Hindi epic, "The Mahabarata" ... A great wise man, who had realized the Supreme Truth, gives the following advice: "Renounce good and evil now, renounce truth and lie; and after that, renouncing all of these completely, finally renounce the act of renouncing itself."
This idea is expressed in the Kata-Upanishad when the hero, Nashiketas, asks Yama, who is the deity of the realm of the dead, "O Yama, tell me, I beg of you, what is in reality beyond good and evil?"
What a stunning article. I love the contemplation and the possibility of all of this. Well done sir!
Why thank you. That's high praised coming from you...
I guess doing the “right” thing always has the risk of collateral damage. You choose the lesser evil for the best good outcome. It’s difficult being human and juggling emotional and logical thinking. It’s the Spock dilemma.
I agree 100%.
Emotional thinking is sad.
+1 for recursive insight!
Ironically, the Spock character regularly showed that he didn't take emotional thinking into account but was rational in every other way. This overall behavior isn't logical, because to ignore certain possibilities -- irrational or not -- is irrational.
Life is hard. Choose your behavior carefully.
Sooo, the end does justify the means?
Only if done altruistically.
Yes. If the overall goal is a net win, then all of the steps used to get there will be seen as justified.
How could it be any different? The logic works at any scale.
Methinks that days long, highly annoying thread last week that truly was getting on my last nerve after being unfortunate enough to be tagged on each and every reply, was an experiment...research re: humanity and how far they’d go to be right!
With that said, this, as usual, is brilliant!
Love you guys, Mean it! 💕
Onward through the phog! 😂
Social media is truly horrific.
true (and here comes the but…) there has not been a major blood letting war since its inception. Major down sides of course, emotional raging being one, but on the flip, it makes projection much easier and highly efficient. i suppose it would be like a big pile of cow shit you use to fertilize your vegetable garden. I suppose that’s the idealist in me though.
WOW! Mind blown. Ty
Very interesting read and theory. I have a different theory. I believe we are in the battle between life and death energies. Death energies live on death and debilitation. The opposite is synergistic energy, life energy, regenerative energy. When we intend to kill our own that means we go against our biological imperative which is to build/favor our own species. Every species does that. Yet we kill our own species systematically. I posit that pedophilia is a symptom of this action (of killing our own species). If we abhorred every intention of killing as a solution to anything, (except in the most rare cases - because nothing is absolute, which raises a conundrum - therefore if nothing is absolute, there must be exceptions to that too) It gets a bit hairy, but intending death to solve problems, only increases the magnitude of the death energies, it's becoming like them, which they actually love to see. If we rather always look for solutions that do not intend death (or taking something down) the power of that would outweigh (I posit) the power of the violent energies. We just haven't tried anything other, so we don't know...
"I know the name of that smiter [i.e., Medjed] among them who belongs to the House of Osiris, who shoots with his eyes, yet is unseen. The sky is encircled with the fiery blast of his mouth and Hāpi makes report, yet he is unseen."